Re: sparse/bicg.b,sparse/cgs.patch and sparse/bicgstab.patch

[R!]

Of course,
I didnt find any information which is the right way how to do it so I write
it here:

Changelog
sparse/bicgstab.m
- new output when calling without arguments
- time optimization: removed certain checks linked to preconditioner which
are unacceptably  slow

sparse/cgs.m
- new output when calling without arguments
- time optimization: removed certain checks linked to preconditioner which
are unacceptably  slow
- certain internal variable was renamed, it has the same names in bicgstab
and bicg now




Jaroslav Hajek-2 wrote:
> 
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:30 AM, R! <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Well,
>>
>> nothing special, I understand that these unnecessary changes I rather bad
>> so
>> I removed them.
> 
> OK. I'ts just Octave coding conventions - stand-alone comments should
> start with ##.
> 
>> Here is better version as i hope
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p23719708/bicg.m bicg.m ,
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p23719708/bicgstab.patch bicgstab.patch ,
>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p23719708/cgs.patch cgs.patch
>>
> 
> Thanks. Could you please also write ChangeLog entries for these?
> 
> -- 
> RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
> computing expert & GNU Octave developer
> Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
> Prague, Czech Republic
> url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/sparse-bicg.b%2Csparse-cgs.patch-and-sparse-bicgstab.patch-tp23696269p23744883.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.