[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: imread on Octave 3.2.0 for Windows
From: |
Alexander Mamonov |
Subject: |
Re: imread on Octave 3.2.0 for Windows |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:51:02 -0400 |
Yes, I generated the diff from mercurial. I still have to learn how
the changesets are generated. When I do so, I'll submit a proper
changeset.
Regards,
Alex
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:16 PM, John W. Eaton<address@hidden> wrote:
> On 17-Jun-2009, Alexander Mamonov wrote:
>
> | I encountered the problem with imread in 3.2.0 MinGW binary, and while
> | examining imread.m I noticed that it doesn't have any tests. So
> | following my own advice I'd like to suggest a patch. I couldn't test
> | it, since imread doesn't work with current 3.2.0 MinGW build, but it
> | runs OK with M*lab.
>
> Did you generate the diff from mercurial? If so, how about submitting
> a changeset instead? That way it is easier for us to apply and
> attribute the change to you. Also, a simple ChangeLog entry should be
> included. Something like
>
> 2009-06-17 Your Name <address@hidden>
>
> * image/imread.m: New test.
>
> in scripts/ChangeLog should do.
>
> Thanks,
>
> jwe
>