[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: subasgn argument optimization
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
Re: FYI: subasgn argument optimization |
|
Date: |
Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:39:01 -0400 |
On 13-Aug-2009, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
| PS. This patch rebases octave_class on top of octave_struct.
It seems that would be a good thing. I can no longer remember why
I didn't do it originally. I don't think I would have avoided
inheritance unless I had a reason, but then maybe I didn't realize how
similar classes were to structs.
| The way field
| references should work for ancestor classes is still somewhat of a
| mystery to me. I'd appreciate comments and suggestions from John or
| anyone interested.
If you are asking for specific comments or suggestions about ancestor
classes, then I probably don't understand the way things are supposed
to work any better than you. I think I would need specific questions
with examples.
jwe