octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: linking liboctave fails (lapack missing?)


From: Thomas Treichl
Subject: Re: linking liboctave fails (lapack missing?)
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:53:01 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Macintosh/20090605)

Benjamin Lindner schrieb:
Benjamin Lindner wrote:
Thomas Treichl wrote:
Benjamin Lindner schrieb:
I also tried with updated versions of msys and tools, but the same errors occur.

$ autoheader --version
autoheader (GNU Autoconf) 2.63
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later
<http://gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Written by Roland McGrath and Akim Demaille.

$ automake --version
automake (GNU automake) 1.11
Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv2+: GNU GPL version 2 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

Written by Tom Tromey <address@hidden>
       and Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden>.

benjamin

The problems do come somewhere from inside of "m4_ifnblank", "m4_ifblank" and "m4_toupper" in file aclocal.m4 and macro OCTAVE_CHECK_LIBRARY. It seems that these functions don't like any of AC_DEFINE, AC_LANG_POP etc. as an argument, but I don't get it corrected...


As a wild guess, can it have something to do with the version of perl or m4 used?

$ perl --version
This is perl, v5.6.1 built for msys
$ m4 --version
GNU M4 1.4.7


Too wild a guess,
the macro m4_ifnblank has been introduced in version 2.64.
there is only 2.63 available on msys, so no wonder it fails, sigh

benjamin

Ha, true ;o)
This fixes all the ./autogen.sh problems. There is no error left anymore,
so AC_PREREQ(2.60) of configure.in should be changed to AC_PREREQ(2.64).

Best regards

  Thomas


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]