Re: 3.2.3 RC2

[Dmitri A. Sergatskov]

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Marco Atzeri<address@hidden> wrote:

> on 3..2.3-RC1 cygwin I had
>
>  ***** testif HAVE_ARPACK
>  [u2,s2,v2,flag] = svds(a,k,0);
>  s2 = diag(s2);
>  assert(flag,!1);
>  assert(s(k:-1:1), s2, 1e-10);
> !!!!! test failed
> assert (s (k:-1:1),s2,1e-10) expected
>   38.034
>   38.034
>   38.015
>   38.015
>   38.004
>   38.004
> but got
>   38.060
>   38.034
>   38.034
>   38.015
>   38.015
>   38..004
>   38.004
> Dimensions don't match>>>>>
>
> Is eventually the expected value wrong ?
>

> Marco
>

It works fine on x86_64, so I tend to blame the problems like this on
wonders of i387 floating point math...
I am surprised that your expected values not the same as mine...

Dmitri.
--