[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnulib and automake
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
Re: gnulib and automake |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:31:13 -0700 |
John W. Eaton wrote:
> It runs cleanly for me.
>
> | automake-1.10
>
> Given what Søren Hauberg said earlier, this version is apparently too
> old. You need 1.11. I already added a requirement for 1.11 in
> configure.ac.
>
> | libtool-1.5.26
>
> I also have
>
> $ libtool --version
> ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 2.2.6
> Written by Gordon Matzigkeit <address@hidden>, 1996
>
> so maybe 1.5.26 is also too old? For now, I've added
>
> LT_PREREQ([2.2.6])
>
> to configure.ac since that version is known to work, but could relax
> that a bit if someone with an older version of libtool confirms that
> it works without problems.
>
> jwe
>
>
I succeeded in compiling except for the gnuplot image problem already
mentioned.
System Details
32-bit Intel Core Duo
Kubuntu Hardy Heron 8.04
automake-1.11
autoconf-2.62
libtool-2.2.6
I went backwards with libtool versions and confirmed that libtool-2.2.4
and libtool-2.2.2 work so the LT_PREREQ can be changed to 2.2.2. It is
the 1.5.X series which doesn't work.
--Rik
- Re: gnulib and automake, (continued)
- Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/31
- Re: gnulib and automake, John W. Eaton, 2009/10/31
- Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/31
- Re: gnulib and automake, John W. Eaton, 2009/10/31
- Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/31
- Re: gnulib and automake, John W. Eaton, 2009/10/31
- Re: gnulib and automake, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/10/31
Re: gnulib and automake, John W. Eaton, 2009/10/30
Re: gnulib and automake, Rik, 2009/10/28