[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:20:42 -0500 |
On 12-Nov-2009, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
| Sorry, but what is that good for? I still don't get the point. I don't think
| Matlab supports this, does it? So what is the motivation? Why does Octave
| distinguish signed and unsigned zeros?
IEEE 754? We've discussed this before:
http://old.nabble.com/Negative-zeros--to844605.html#a845854
jwe
- unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/12
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Michael D. Godfrey, 2009/11/12
- unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/12
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/12
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/13
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/13
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/17
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/17
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/17
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/17
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/17
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/17
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/11/17
- Re: unary mapper system redesigned + a few questions, John W. Eaton, 2009/11/17