[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GPU Engine for Octave
|
From: |
Judd Storrs |
|
Subject: |
Re: GPU Engine for Octave |
|
Date: |
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 12:08:23 -0500 |
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:02 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> Simply declaring some interface to be an "open standard" doesn't allow
> you to sidestep the terms of the GPL.
Unlike, say, the MEX interface which isn't even an "open standard"?
--judd
- GPU Engine for Octave, jaideep singh, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Søren Hauberg, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Shai Ayal, 2009/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, jaideep singh, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave,
Judd Storrs <=
- Message not available
- Fwd: GPU Engine for Octave, jaideep singh, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Michael Creel, 2009/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Judd Storrs, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Judd Storrs, 2009/12/08
- Re: GPU Engine for Octave, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/09