[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:44:48 +0000 |
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I don't think it make sense to continue submitting patches to
>> maintain MSVC compatibility. Though I'll probably continue to
>> maintain a patch for my own purpose. So if anybody wants
>> to compile octave with MSVC, you can still contact me (this
>> last sentence it just for reference, if anybody searches the mailing
>> list).
>>
>
> I 've been doing the same for Intel's C++ for Linux (and I can offer
> useful hints there too). I guess it only makes sense to include
> workarounds for bugs in GCC (given that it's part of GNU), and only in
> the newest one or two series.
BTW, one should *really* remove the README.MSVC file from
the source tree. It doesn't make sense to keep it.
Michael.
- Patches to enable MSVC compilation, Michael Goffioul, 2009/12/07
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/08
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, Michael Goffioul, 2009/12/08
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/08
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation,
Michael Goffioul <=
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/08
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/10
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/10
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/10
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/10
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/10
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/08
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/12/08
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, John W. Eaton, 2009/12/08
- Re: Patches to enable MSVC compilation, Michael Goffioul, 2009/12/08