[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: warn when core functions are shadowed
From: |
Jaroslav Hajek |
Subject: |
Re: warn when core functions are shadowed |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:06:35 +0100 |
2010/2/2 John W. Eaton <address@hidden>:
> On 2-Feb-2010, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>
> | > If we do want to add a command-line option, then we can make it work for
> | > all warning flags:
> | >
> | > --warning ID set warning state for ID to "on"
> | > --no-warning ID set warning state for ID to "off"
> |
> | Cool idea.
>
> Thinking about this a little more, maybe it should be
>
> --warning-on ID
> --warning-off ID
> --warning-error ID
>
Perhaps. But I think the third one is mostly useless, because nobody
in his right mind wants errors in startup files. Afterwards it can be
done in .octaverc.
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek, PhD
computing expert & GNU Octave developer
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
- warn when core functions are shadowed, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/02/01
- Re: warn when core functions are shadowed, Dupuis, 2010/02/01
- Re: warn when core functions are shadowed, Robert T. Short, 2010/02/01
- Re: warn when core functions are shadowed, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/02/01
- Re: warn when core functions are shadowed, Robert T. Short, 2010/02/01
- Re: warn when core functions are shadowed, John W. Eaton, 2010/02/01
- Re: warn when core functions are shadowed, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/02/02
- Re: warn when core functions are shadowed, John W. Eaton, 2010/02/02
- Re: warn when core functions are shadowed,
Jaroslav Hajek <=
- Re: warn when core functions are shadowed, John W. Eaton, 2010/02/02
warn when core functions are shadowed, John W. Eaton, 2010/02/01