Re: Logos proposal

[Svante Signell]

On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 15:47 +0200, Fotios Kasolis wrote:
> 
> On Jun 15, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> 
> > On 14 June 2010 17:02, Fotios Kasolis <address@hidden> 
...
> 
> Try the following (i like all of them) 
> 1) \mathcal{O}\text{C}^\mathrm{T}\forall\beta\mathcal{E}
> 2) \mathbb{O}\text{C}^\text{T}\forall\vec{\mathcal{V}}\exists
> 3) \mathbb{O}\text{C}^\text{T}\forall\vec{\mathcal{V}}e


Sorry to chime in here, but this is fun. What about:

4) $\mathcal{O}\text{c}^{\scriptscriptstyle\mathbf{T}}\Lambda
\vec{\mathcal{\nu}}\mathcal{E}$

5) $\mathcal{O}\text{c}^{\scriptscriptstyle\mathbf{T}}\Lambda
\vec{\mathcal{\nu}}\epsilon$

6) $\mathcal{O}\text{c}^{\scriptscriptstyle\mathbf{T}}\Lambda
\vec{\mathcal{\nu}}\exists$

7) $\mathcal{O}\text{c}^{\scriptscriptstyle\mathbf{T}}\alpha
\vec{\mathcal{\nu}}\epsilon$

I think I prefer number 4) or 7), with or without \vec{} on \nu.