[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wait_for_file ??
|
From: |
Olaf Till |
|
Subject: |
Re: wait_for_file ?? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Sep 2010 12:18:18 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 02:00:38AM -0700, Michael D Godfrey wrote:
> This is bad practice since fclose doe not do an fflush.
Sorry for meddling in, but I think you are wrong here. fclose not
implying fflush would be really weird. Olaf
- Re: need someone to check a changeset, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2010/09/01
- Re: need someone to check a changeset, Ben Abbott, 2010/09/01
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: wait_for_file ??, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, Shai Ayal, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, Shai Ayal, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??,
Olaf Till <=
- Re: wait_for_file ??, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, Ben Abbott, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, John W. Eaton, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, Michael D Godfrey, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, bpabbott, 2010/09/03
- Re: wait_for_file ??, bpabbott, 2010/09/03