[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and &
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
Subject: |
Re: stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and & |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:44:49 +0200 |
tor, 07 10 2010 kl. 06:05 -0400, skrev John W. Eaton:
> I'm considering applying the following patch so that Octave can be
> compatible with the stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for the
> normally element-by-element | and & operators.
I am not entirely against such a change. I think everybody here agrees
that the "feature" is just plain stupid, but it is not an uncommon
feature request. I do, however, think we should raise a warning every
time a | or a & is interpreted when the feature is enabled. I really
fear it will be hard to track down silly bugs otherwise.
Soren
- stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and &, John W. Eaton, 2010/10/07
- Re: stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and &,
Søren Hauberg <=
- Re: stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and &, CdeMills, 2010/10/07
- Re: stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and &, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/10/07
- Re: stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and &, John W. Eaton, 2010/10/07
- Re: stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and &, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/10/07
- Re: stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and &, John W. Eaton, 2010/10/07
- Re: stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and &, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/10/08
- Re: stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and &, John W. Eaton, 2010/10/08
- Re: stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and &, Søren Hauberg, 2010/10/09
- Re: stupid Matlab-style short-circuit behavior for | and &, Ben Abbott, 2010/10/09