[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scale problem using plot()
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: Scale problem using plot() |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:27:45 +0800 |
On Oct 26, 2010, at 12:22 AM, Michael D Godfrey wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 09:08 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>> I don't understand what you mean by "the scales change"
>>
>> Can you give an example?
>>
>> The patch I attached earlier properly crops the grid, ticks, and ticklabels
>> so they aren't drawn outside the axis limits, so the "extraneous" stuff will
>> be gone once the changeset is committed.
>>
>> Ben
>>
> Here is is. With no set xtick or ytick, yscale is [60 140]. After set
> xtick and ytick
> the yscale is [56 140]. And, after also doing set xlim and
> ylim the yscale stays at [56 140].
>
> Do you consider this a bug?
>
> Michael
Please give me some code so I can parse your meaning.
The example you give initially had a yscale of [60, 140] before and after the
yticks were set.
I'm 12 hrs off my usual time zone, so its time for me to get some sleep. I'll
check back in the morning
Ben
- Re: Scale problem using plot(), (continued)
- Re: Scale problem using plot(), Michael D Godfrey, 2010/10/25
- Re: Scale problem using plot(), Ben Abbott, 2010/10/25
- Message not available
- Re: Scale problem using plot(), Ben Abbott, 2010/10/25
- Re: Scale problem using plot(), Michael D Godfrey, 2010/10/25
- Re: Scale problem using plot(), Ben Abbott, 2010/10/25
- Re: Scale problem using plot(), Michael D Godfrey, 2010/10/25
- Re: Scale problem using plot(),
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: Scale problem using plot(), Michael D Godfrey, 2010/10/25
- Re: Scale problem using plot(), Ben Abbott, 2010/10/25
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Scale problem using plot(), Ben Abbott, 2010/10/26