Re: new OOP syntax

[John W. Eaton]

On 16-Nov-2010, Ben Abbott wrote:

| I'll give some more time for others to respond, and then submit a new entry 
into the tracker.

This is really a large project and I would consider it a missing
feature, not a bug, so I'm not sure that it is appropriate for the bug
tracker.

It's not like there is simply new syntax involved that would tie in to
the current OO features.  Supporting classdef requires a completely
new way of handing a different type of object than we currently have.

jwe