[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch for gamma test
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: patch for gamma test |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2010 20:20:49 -0500 |
On Nov 20, 2010, at 6:28 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
>> --- Mar 16/11/10, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> ha scritto:
>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 16, 2010, at 10:35 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>>
>>>> --- Mar 16/11/10, Ben Abbott ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>>> Data: Martedì 16 novembre 2010, 15:27
>>>>> On Nov 16, 2010, at 5:03 AM, Marco
>>>>> Atzeri wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> As discussed on
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2010-October/017501.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> this changeset amend the expectation from
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gamma(-1)= NaN
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> gamma(-1)= Inf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Marco
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <gamma.patch>
>>>>>
>>>>> Matlab agrees that gamma(-1) is Inf, not NaN.
>>>>>
>>>>> Octave gives NaN for me. Should the sources
>>> be fixed
>>>>> to return the proper result?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ben
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I presume it is system dependent.
>>>> On cygwin gamma(-1)= Inf
>>>>
>>>> which system are you running ?
>>>>
>>>> Marco
>>>
>>> I'm running MacOS 10.6.5.
>>>
>>> Ben
>>>
>>
>> Could you check if this patch solve the discrepancy ?
>>
>> Marco
>>
>> <gamma_2.patch>
>
>
> Works for me on Ubuntu 10.04. I hope to check on MacOS 10.6.5 in a few hrs.
>
> Ben
Works for MacOS 10.6.5 as well.
I recommend you push this change.
Ben