octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Improvements in the calculation of text extents


From: Konstantinos Poulios
Subject: Re: Improvements in the calculation of text extents
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:19:20 +0200

2010/12/24 Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso <address@hidden>:
>> On Dec 22, 2010, at 6:43 AM, logari81 wrote:
>>
>>> Currently, the calculation of the extent of text objects in Octave is
>>> very limited. For example it doesn't take into account the rotation
>>> angle:
>>>
>>> Revision 11407 of Octave:
>
> This number doesn't make sense in general. Changeset numbers are local
> to a repository. While it looks likes people have been making a strong
> effort to keep the hg history linear, in my view an artficial
> representation of what's actually happening in development, as soon as
> you break linearity of the history, it becomes impossible to
> universally number changesets. In a distributed VCS, this break from
> linearity will happen sooner or later (in fact, it's already happened
> a few times, right now buried deep in the history).
>

yes, I am aware of this property of distributed cvs types. Actually,
when I refer to version numbers, these do not correspond to my local
repository but to the official one here:
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/
In this case revision 11407 is:
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/ed827ffa5a43

> On 23 December 2010 20:53, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
>> This changeset doesn't apply for me. In particular, some lines from
>> graphics.cc seem to be different than what is indicated by your
>> changeset.
>
> More telling, the parent node for this changeset is
> f94a71bf5e88151529c2ee7ecdf10c6f5ad29aa9, which doesn't exist in the
> Savannah repo.

oups, sorry for this, I tried to merge three commits into one but
apparently I missed the first one. In the attachment you can find the
complete version, hopefully with no further errors (I had to recover
the the first part of the changes from my memory, but it seems to work
well).

>
> Kostas, all you have to do is provide the changeset with that hash,
> which should exist in your local repository. The hg export command
> lets you specify more than one changeset, so it looks like you have
> more than one local commit than what you've shared.
>
> - Jordi G. H.
>

Kostas

Attachment: text-extents.changeset
Description: Binary data


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]