[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branching for release?
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: branching for release? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 04:36:23 +0900 (JST) |
Hello
--- bpabbott wrote:
> Printing under MinGW needs to work correctly. Since eps is now working (a bit
> ugly), this may be
> resolved soon.
>
> Ben
Remaining serious bug on MinGW is only fltk emf printing and temporary file
deleting bug.
The former will be solved by cooperative work with Ben.
And the latter is intrinsically 'unlink' implementation on MinGW platform.
I have already submitted the not clear patch for this issue.
Anyway for branching in the near future, I am not against it.
Regards
Tatsuro
--------------------------------------
Get the new Internet Explorer 8 optimized for Yahoo! JAPAN
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ie8/
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], (continued)
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/21
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/21
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], logari81, 2011/01/22
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], logari81, 2011/01/22
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/22
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/22
- Re: Matlab behavior for grid lines [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/22
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/20
- Re: FLTK changesets [was: branching for release?], Ben Abbott, 2011/01/21
Re: branching for release?, bpabbott, 2011/01/18
- Re: branching for release?,
Tatsuro MATSUOKA <=
branching for release?, John W. Eaton, 2011/01/19