octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug #32319


From: Ben Abbott
Subject: Re: Bug #32319
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:48:50 -0500

On Feb 14, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Michael D Godfrey wrote:

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:      Re: Bug #32319
> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:27:27 +0100
> From: logari81 <address@hidden>
> To:   Michael D Godfrey <address@hidden>
> CC:   octave maintainers mailing list <address@hidden>
> 
> On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 13:11 -0800, Michael D Godfrey wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Do you want to push the changeset for this bug (your bug32319-1b.diff
> > plus the Changelog entry)?
> > 
> > Does it make sense to close this report and open a new one about
> > plots not being refreshed, which I mentioned in my last comment on
> > 32319?  Or,  do you already know why that is happening?
> > 
> > Michael
> > 
> 
> hmm, I think we'd better wait for jwe's opinion about the patch. Maybe
> he prefers to fix this bug making correct use of waitpid.
> 
> In any case I don't have any explanation about the refresh problem yet,
> but it would probably be easy to fix if I would have a way to reproduce
> it.
> 
> Kostas
> 
> The patch referred to works correctly for me.  It fixes
> the fdopen error problem in fltk backend.  I noticed
> that it has been "waiting" long enough so that its lines
> numbers not longer match the current source.
> 
> Is it OK for Kostas to push an updated version?
> 
> Michael

I have no objection.

Ben




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]