[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is OCTINTERP_API still relevant?
|
From: |
Benjamin Lindner |
|
Subject: |
Re: Is OCTINTERP_API still relevant? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:05:07 +0100 |
> For the record, I still compile octave with MSVC. It is required because
> it defines what are the exported symbols (MSVC does not auto-export
> symbols). But besides its use with MSVC, I can (should?) also be
> used under GCC to defines what are the exported symbols and part
> of the octave API, by using the visibility attribute.
And since gcc 4.5.0 changed it's behaviour on which-symbols-to-export
it's even more relevant also for gcc code, so it should be used
anyway.
benjamin