[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SLATEC error: Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
From: |
Camillo |
Subject: |
Re: SLATEC error: Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Mar 2011 17:12:15 +0100 |
On 27/feb/2011, at 11.29, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2011, at 3:30 , ext Ben Abbott wrote:
>
>> On Feb 24, 2011, at 7:57 PM, Camillo wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am working on a Mac build of Octave 3.4.0. It's almost complete: it
>>> passes 6908 tests, has 2 known failures, and 5 unexpected ones. Four of
>>> these five are due to the same issue, an exception inside SLATEC:
>>> "Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy". I don't know Fortran
>>> and I'm not sure how to best debug the issue. The compilers I am using are
>>> gcc and gfortran 4.2.1.
>>>
>>> I first posted this question on the general mailing list, where Ben Abbot
>>> asked for more information, so here it is:
>>>
>>>> Where did you get your gfortran?
>>>
>>> http://r.research.att.com/gfortran-42-5664.pkg
>>>
>>>> What dependencies did you install?
>>>
>>> All, except for gnuplot and ghostscript.
>>>
>>>> What was the result of running ./configure? (it gives a summary at the end)
>>>>
>>>> Finally, please copy-n-paste the actual error.
>>>
>>> I'll attach the configure summary, and here are the insteresting parts of
>>> the output of "make check":
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/besselj.cc ........................... PASS 180/180
>>> src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/betainc.cc ........................... ***MESSAGE FROM
>>> ROUTINE INITS IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
>>> ***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
>>> * Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
>>> * ERROR NUMBER = 1
>>> *
>>> ***END OF MESSAGE
>>>
>>> ***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
>>> 0 ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
>>> LIBRARY SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START NERR LEVEL COUNT
>>> SLATEC INITS Chebyshev series too 1 1 1
>>>
>>> ***MESSAGE FROM ROUTINE INITS IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
>>> ***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
>>> * Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
>>> * ERROR NUMBER = 1
>>> *
>>> ***END OF MESSAGE
>>>
>>> ***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
>>> 0 ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
>>> LIBRARY SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START NERR LEVEL COUNT
>>> SLATEC INITS Chebyshev series too 1 1 2
>>>
>>> PASS 4/6 FAIL 2
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/gammainc.cc .......................... ***MESSAGE FROM
>>> ROUTINE INITS IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
>>> ***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
>>> * Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
>>> * ERROR NUMBER = 1
>>> *
>>> ***END OF MESSAGE
>>>
>>> ***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
>>> 0 ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
>>> LIBRARY SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START NERR LEVEL COUNT
>>> SLATEC INITS Chebyshev series too 1 1 3
>>>
>>> ***MESSAGE FROM ROUTINE INITS IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
>>> ***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
>>> * Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
>>> * ERROR NUMBER = 1
>>> *
>>> ***END OF MESSAGE
>>>
>>> ***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
>>> 0 ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
>>> LIBRARY SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START NERR LEVEL COUNT
>>> SLATEC INITS Chebyshev series too 1 1 4
>>>
>>> PASS 2/4 FAIL 2
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> This is the information about the fifth error from fntests.log:
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> processing
>>>>>>>> /private/tmp/homebrew-octave-3.4.0-kEbx/octave-3.4.0/src/mappers.cc
>>> ***** assert(arg (single(-1)), single(pi));
>>> !!!!! test failed
>>> assert (arg (single (-1)),single (pi)) expected
>>> 3.1416
>>> but got
>>> 3.1416
>>> values do not match
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> I know about the problem with Apple's BLAS and gfortran, and I am using a
>>> small wrapper library for the affected routines (as suggested in
>>> <http://developer.apple.com/hardwaredrivers/ve/errata.html#fortran_conventions>);
>>> this is the "dotwrp" library you can see in the configure summary. I was
>>> told that a different wrapper has been proposed on this list, replacing
>>> some functions from LAPACK as well; I was wondering if anybody has a simple
>>> test case for some of those functions, so I could quickly check if the
>>> library I'm using is sufficient.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Camillo Lugaresi
>>>
>>> <configure summary>
>>
>> I am also using 4.2.1 and the gfortran from AT&T.
>>
>> Iv'e compiled for 32bit and do not see the SLATEC problem.
>>
>> Jarno / Richard, might this be related to the 64bit vecLib problem?
>>
>
> I recall seeing similar error messages in the past. I recommend trying with
> the patch at http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/index.php?7468.
>
> That patch provider gfortran native calling convention stubs for Apple BLAS
> and LAPACK calls. However, it does not otherwise replace any LAPACK routines.
>
> Jarno
I tried applying that patch. Rather than fighting with autotools (OS X comes
with an older version than needed), I edited the configuration manually, but I
think I got it to work. However, when I run "make check", I get this:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Integrated test scripts:
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/besselj.cc ........................... PASS 180/180
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/betainc.cc ........................... ***MESSAGE FROM
ROUTINE INITS IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
* Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
* ERROR NUMBER = 1
*
***END OF MESSAGE
***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
0 ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
LIBRARY SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START NERR LEVEL COUNT
SLATEC INITS Chebyshev series too 1 1 1
***MESSAGE FROM ROUTINE INITS IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
* Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy
* ERROR NUMBER = 1
*
***END OF MESSAGE
***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
0 ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
LIBRARY SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START NERR LEVEL COUNT
SLATEC INITS Chebyshev series too 1 1 2
PASS 4/6 FAIL 2
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/bsxfun.cc ............................ PASS 72/72
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/cellfun.cc ........................... PASS 77/77
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/chol.cc .............................. PASS 26/26
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/conv2.cc ............................. PASS 4/4
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/convhulln.cc ......................... PASS 2/2
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/dassl.cc ............................. PASS 4/4
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/det.cc ............................... PASS 5/5
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/dlmread.cc ........................... PASS 20/20
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/dmperm.cc ............................ PASS 5/5
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/eig.cc ............................... PASS 20/20
src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/eigs.cc ..............................panic: Segmentation
fault -- stopping myself...
make[2]: *** [check] Segmentation fault
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [check] Error 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What output do you get for "make check"?
Cheers,
CL
- Re: SLATEC error: Chebyshev series too short for specified accuracy,
Camillo <=