Re: Deprecate nargchk, nargoutchk?

[Rik]

On 04/21/2011 09:07 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 21-Apr-2011, Rik wrote:
> 
> | Can we deprecate nargchk and nargoutchk?
> 
> No, because they are core Matlab functions and exist in Octave for
> compatibility.  I don't recommend using them for the reasons you
> state.  I prefer explicit checks that end up calling print_usage if
> some condition on the inputs is not met.

I should have checked the core list.  I've added a note in the
documentation about the preferred Octave way of doing things (8c25df502846).

--Rik