Re: [OctDev] Octave-Forge bugs in the tracker?

[c.]

On 7 Aug 2011, at 12:41, Søren Hauberg wrote:

> søn, 31 07 2011 kl. 22:00 +0100, skrev Carnë Draug:
>> at the moment, only a small part of the octave-forge devs has given an
>> opinion on the subject. It would be nice to gather the opinion of
>> everyone else, even if it's just "I don't really care, it's all the
>> same to me".
>> 
>> The request has been made on savannah and it seems they're just
>> waiting for our reply (perfectly fine if we still decide not to move)
>> https://savannah.gnu.org/task/index.php?11233
> 
> Well, better late than never... (sorry 'bout that)
> 
> From a developers point of view I do not think it matters much where
> Octave-Forge bugs are stored. If we just want a bug tracker (which I
> guess is better than me having a bunch of mails marked as unread; that's
> my way of keeping track of things), then I guess we can use the one at
> Source-Forge.
> 
> My concern is for the users: most users have a too hard time figuring
> out if a bug is in Octave or in Octave-Forge (heck, even old farts like
> myself makes mistakes in this regard from time to time). So, I think it
> would be nice to give the users a single point of entry for filing bug
> reports. JWE's point about not all Octave-Forge developers should have
> full access to modifying the Octave bug tracker is a good one, and I
> agree that Octave-Forge should not use the Octave tracker. Should we
> then use another bug tracker hosted at Savannah? If bugs can easily be
> moved between the two trackers, then fine by me. If not, I don't see the
> point. Has it been determined if it is easy to move bugs between
> Savannah trackers?
> 
> Søren

I'd say, if what we need is a tracker, we can just start using the SF one, no 
need to move to savannah for that.
c.