octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Function handles, feval's docstring


From: Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
Subject: Re: Function handles, feval's docstring
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:48:54 -0500

2011/8/7 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>:
> feval seems to have an outdated docstring that says Octave doesn't
> have function pointers, probably from the days when Octave didn't have
> function handles. Would it make sense to change this to say that feval
> is most useful when you have function names as strings instead of
> handles?

I have pushed the following cset:

     http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/8b5b85e26246

- Jordi G. H.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]