[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Function handles, feval's docstring
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: Function handles, feval's docstring |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:48:54 -0500 |
2011/8/7 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>:
> feval seems to have an outdated docstring that says Octave doesn't
> have function pointers, probably from the days when Octave didn't have
> function handles. Would it make sense to change this to say that feval
> is most useful when you have function names as strings instead of
> handles?
I have pushed the following cset:
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/8b5b85e26246
- Jordi G. H.