[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug?
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: [POSSIBLE VIRUS:###] gl2ps bug? |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:22:46 -0400 |
On Sep 16, 2011, at 7:54 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2011, at 4:20 AM, Michael Goffioul wrote:
>
>> 2011/9/16 Ben Abbott <address@hidden>:
>>>
>>> On Sep 15, 2011, at 9:02 PM, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sep 15, 2011, at 8:16 PM, Michael Godfrey wrote:
>>>>>> I looked quickly at this patch. It seems to have many changes
>>>>>> whose effect is nothing. i.e. a line is replaced by an identical
>>>>>> line. Is it possible that there was an error in building the
>>>>>> patch? Some changes were also introduced, but it is hard to
>>>>>> isolate them from the "do nothing" changes. In any case, it would
>>>>>> seem good to back it out until the problem can be isolated and a
>>>>>> patch which only makes changes can be generated.
>>>>
>>>> On 15 September 2011 19:59, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>> I agree. There are a lot of changes that appear to be "do nothing".
>>>>> Does anyone know why "hg diff" is detecting a change where there
>>>>> appears to be none?
>>>>
>>>> It's whitespace. Do "hg diff -w" to omit whitespace changes.
>>>>
>>>> - Jordi G. H.
>>>
>>> Thanks Jordi.
>>>
>>> The part that is left is short enough that is should be possible to isolate
>>> the problem.
>>>
>>> The announcement for Version 1.3.6 is below ...
>>>
>>> http://www.geuz.org/pipermail/gl2ps-announce/2011/000019.html
>>>
>>> The pixel zoom for ps images looks like a good place to start.
>>>
>>> Ben
>>
>> Ben,
>>
>> There's something weird when I parse the logs for the file gl2ps.c
>> from the hgweb
>> interface. The change
>> http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/7dedfd70dd9f
>> seems to add support for pixelzoom (claiming to pull changes from
>> gl2ps-1.3.5-svn),
>> but then the change http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/7b4ec6f841a2
>> seems to revert everything (claiming to sync with gl2ps-1.3.5).
>>
>> Moreover, the announcement
>> http://www.geuz.org/pipermail/gl2ps-announce/2011/000019.html
>> indicates that the current gl2ps version is 1.3.6 (not 1.3.5). Is it
>> possible that you
>> accidentally removed support for pixelzoom, by syncing with the wrong
>> gl2ps version?
>>
>> Michael.
>
> Unfortunately, that sort of thing is all too common with me :-(
>
> I'll backout the last gl2ps update and take a closer look this weekend.
>
> Ben
I've pushed the correct update to glps-1.3.6
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/54f804016276
Ben