[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for"
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for" |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:18:40 -0400 |
On 29-Sep-2011, Mark Everitt wrote:
| Hi John,
|
| You've just saved me a lot of puzzling! Thanks for the boost.
Well, I know that part, so it was not too hard.
To make it fully functional, you'll have to somehow arrange for the
final loops for the cases where the RHS is a range (the simpler case)
or a matrix or struct object (the second, maybe slightly harder case)
to be split up and executed in parallel. I'm not sure how to do
that part.
jwe
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", (continued)
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/26
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/26
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/26
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/27
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/09/27
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/28
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Mark Everitt, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for",
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Søren Hauberg, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", John W. Eaton, 2011/09/29
- Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Søren Hauberg, 2011/09/29
Re: Handling "parfor" as "for", Jussi Lehtola, 2011/09/26