octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Handling "parfor" as "for"


From: John W. Eaton
Subject: Re: Handling "parfor" as "for"
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:23:44 -0400

On 29-Sep-2011, Søren Hauberg wrote:

| tor, 29 09 2011 kl. 02:58 -0400, skrev John W. Eaton:
| > Now Octave can accept statements of the form
| > 
| >   parfor LHS = EXPR BODY end
| >   parfor ( LHS = EXPR, MAXPROC ) BODY end
| 
| Does it have the corresponding 'end's ? I.e. can I write
| 
|   parfor LHS = EXPR
|     BODY
|   endfor
| 
| or
| 
|   parfor LHS = EXPR
|     BODY
|   endparfor
| 
| ?

Sorry, I'm tired and did not notice you ended the first parfor loop with
endfor.  That would be an error, but you can use endparfor to end a
parfor loop.

Well, I spelled it end_parfor, but it should be endparfor instead.
That's a trivial change.

jwe


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]