[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave? |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Oct 2011 08:51:31 -0400 |
On 6-Oct-2011, Carnë Draug wrote:
| On 6 October 2011 03:56, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
| > Ah, now I see, the real internal variable that holds the argument
| > names is a special hidden variable called ".argn." that is only
| > accessible with __varval__ (".argn.").
|
| This "__varval__ (".argn.")" also fails inside subsref. Having a =
| __varval__ (".argn.") returns the error
|
| "value on right hand side of assignment is undefined"
I haven't looked at the details yet, but I'm pretty sure this is
happening because .argn./argn is for some reason not being initialized
in the context of subsref.
jwe
- Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave ?, (continued)
- Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave ?, Ben Abbott, 2011/10/23
- Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave?, Carnë Draug, 2011/10/24
- Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave ?, Ben Abbott, 2011/10/24
- Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave?, Carnë Draug, 2011/10/24
- Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave ?, Ben Abbott, 2011/10/24
- Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave?, Carnë Draug, 2011/10/25
- Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave ?, Ben Abbott, 2011/10/25
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave?, Carnë Draug, 2011/10/26
- Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave?, John W. Eaton, 2011/10/05
- Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave?, Carnë Draug, 2011/10/06
- Re: `argn' ? … still part of Octave?,
John W. Eaton <=