octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Ordering of return values in C++ files


From: John W. Eaton
Subject: Ordering of return values in C++ files
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 12:10:20 -0500

On  9-Dec-2011, Rik wrote:

| 12/9/11
| 
| John,
| 
| I believe you mentioned at some point that the following construction
| 
| retval(1) = xxx;
| retval(0) = yyy;
| 
| is preferable to
| 
| retval(0) = yyy;
| retval(1) = xxx;
| 
| because octave_value_list will only be sized once.  Is my memory correct?

Yes, because octave_value_list is implemented with an
Array<octave_value> internally.

| If this is true then there are 51 instances of the bad pattern which would
| be trivial to fix.

OK, fixing that would be fine with me.

Thanks,

jwe


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]