octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Octave 3.5.90 snapshot available for ftp


From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Subject: Re: Octave 3.5.90 snapshot available for ftp
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:48:56 +0900 (JST)

Hello

--- On Thu, 2011/12/15, John W. Eaton  wrote:

> [Oops, I really thought I had sent this message, but there it was,
> hiding out as a draft in an Emacs buffer.  No wonder there were no
> replies... --jwe]
> 
> 
> A new snapshot of Octave is now available from alpha.gnu.org in the
> directory /gnu/octave:
> 
>   54442245b840483f40b9c0f9026b1256  octave-3.5.90.tar.gz
> 
>   -rw-r--r-- 1 3003 3002 18107269 Dec 12 04:17 octave-3.5.90.tar.gz
> 
> The snapshot is tagged in the usual way (ss-3-5-90) in the Mercurial
> archive.
> 
> Please remember that these snapshots are provided for testing
> purposes.  I do not consider them to be Octave releases.  If people
> think there will be confusion because of the version number, then we
> can add a notice to the Octave startup message.
> 
> I plan to release Octave 3.6.0 in the next few weeks.  Even if you
> have been building Octave regularly from the Mercurial archive, it
> would help if you could build from the snapshot and report any
> problems.
> 
> jwe

Integrated test scripts:

  src\data.cc ............................................ PASS  796/798  FAIL 2
  src\toplev.cc .......................................... PASS    5/6    FAIL 1
  scripts\general\quadl.m ................................ PASS    4/5    FAIL 1
  scripts\miscellaneous\dos.m ............................ PASS    2/3    FAIL 1

Summary:

  PASS  10138
  FAIL      5

The fails of toplev.cc and dos.m seemed to corrected and the changeset seemed 
to be  merged in the stable branch as Rik told in the last post in the 
following.
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?34942

In my opinion the changeset is better to be also merged into the snapshot.

Regards

Tatsuro



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]