octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fixes for gl2ps ?


From: Ben Abbott
Subject: Re: fixes for gl2ps ?
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 07:42:43 -0500

On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:

> On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> 
>> On 12/31/2011 10:11 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>> 
>>> On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:24 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
>>> 
>>>> | I did note a couple of things with rpmlint:
>>>> |
>>>> | octave-debuginfo.x86_64: W:
>>>> | spurious-executable-perm 
>>>> /usr/src/debug/octave-3.5.90/liboctave/singleton-cleanup.h
>>>> | octave-debuginfo.x86_64: E:
>>>> | incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/octave-3.5.90/src/gl2ps.h
>>>> | octave-debuginfo.x86_64: W:
>>>> | spurious-executable-perm 
>>>> /usr/src/debug/octave-3.5.90/liboctave/oct-locbuf.h
>>>> | octave-debuginfo.x86_64: E:
>>>> | incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/octave-3.5.90/src/gl2ps.c
>>>> 
>>>> I fixed the file permissions.
>>>> 
>>>> We just import the gl2ps.c and gl2ps.h files from the gl2ps project,
>>>> so I think the right place to fix that is in their sources.  Could
>>>> someone please do that?  http://geuz.org/gl2ps/
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> jwe
>>> 
>>> Has this been reported to Christophe Geuzaine yet ?
>>> 
>>> If not, if someone can give a brief explanation to me (I'm not familiar 
>>> with rpmlint or what is implied by the result above), I can file a bug 
>>> report.
>>> 
>>> Ben
>> 
>> The FSF has a new address.  The license header in the files have the old 
>> address.
> 
> Ok. I've filed a bug report.
> 
>       https://geuz.org/trac/gl2ps/ticket/7
> 
> Ben

The address has been fixed upstream. I'll push a changeset.

Ben



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]