[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fixes for gl2ps ?
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: fixes for gl2ps ? |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Jan 2012 07:42:43 -0500 |
On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
>> On 12/31/2011 10:11 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>>
>>> On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:24 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
>>>
>>>> | I did note a couple of things with rpmlint:
>>>> |
>>>> | octave-debuginfo.x86_64: W:
>>>> | spurious-executable-perm
>>>> /usr/src/debug/octave-3.5.90/liboctave/singleton-cleanup.h
>>>> | octave-debuginfo.x86_64: E:
>>>> | incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/octave-3.5.90/src/gl2ps.h
>>>> | octave-debuginfo.x86_64: W:
>>>> | spurious-executable-perm
>>>> /usr/src/debug/octave-3.5.90/liboctave/oct-locbuf.h
>>>> | octave-debuginfo.x86_64: E:
>>>> | incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/octave-3.5.90/src/gl2ps.c
>>>>
>>>> I fixed the file permissions.
>>>>
>>>> We just import the gl2ps.c and gl2ps.h files from the gl2ps project,
>>>> so I think the right place to fix that is in their sources. Could
>>>> someone please do that? http://geuz.org/gl2ps/
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> jwe
>>>
>>> Has this been reported to Christophe Geuzaine yet ?
>>>
>>> If not, if someone can give a brief explanation to me (I'm not familiar
>>> with rpmlint or what is implied by the result above), I can file a bug
>>> report.
>>>
>>> Ben
>>
>> The FSF has a new address. The license header in the files have the old
>> address.
>
> Ok. I've filed a bug report.
>
> https://geuz.org/trac/gl2ps/ticket/7
>
> Ben
The address has been fixed upstream. I'll push a changeset.
Ben
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: fixes for gl2ps ?,
Ben Abbott <=