[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Necessity of epstool?
|
From: |
Alexander Hansen |
|
Subject: |
Re: Necessity of epstool? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:55:31 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 1/10/12 6:18 PM, J. Luis wrote:
<snip>
> Yes. AFAIK, ImageMagick was drop from Fink and the tendency is to
> replace IM by GM
>
> Joaquim
No, it wasn't.
It only just got added for Lion recently, because it needed patching,
but Fink currently has both ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick on all of
our supported platforms.
I continue to use only GraphicsMagick for Fink's Octave packages
because I don't want to have to deal with having a
GraphicsMagick-based variant and an ImageMagick-based variant.
- --
Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
Fink User Liaison
http://finkakh.wordpress.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk8Mz/MACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ/KRQCeOcBjjBvb3Psgu4O7EMVZYP5e
4xwAniXdQAQ+Xe686Hui/U+ab5cbh0Ec
=ZPrz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Necessity of epstool?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/10