[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ? |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:25:27 -0500 |
On Jan 15, 2012, at 10:12 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2012, at 8:28 PM, "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 15-Jan-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
>>
>> | I've fixed a bug where bit map output was being saved in the improper size.
>> |
>> | https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?35307
>> |
>> | Its not pushed yet, as I'm not sure which branch it should be applied to.
>> |
>> | If you don't have a preference, I'll push it to default.
>>
>> Did this feature work correctly in previous versions of Octave, or has
>> this bug always been present?
>>
>> jwe
>
> This bug existed for the entire 3.4.x series. It was introduced when we began
> to use gs to convert eps to bitmap formats. The 3.2.x series would have
> worked correctly.
>
> Ben
I pushed to default.
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/df695e37d404
Ben
- patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/15
- patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/15
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/15
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?,
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/29