octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?


From: Ben Abbott
Subject: Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:17:07 -0500

On Jan 17, 2012, at 9:14 AM, John W. Eaton wrote:

> On 17-Jan-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
> 
> | 
> | On Jan 15, 2012, at 10:12 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
> | 
> | > On Jan 15, 2012, at 8:28 PM, "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> wrote:
> | > 
> | >> On 15-Jan-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
> | >> 
> | >> | I've fixed a bug where bit map output was being saved in the improper 
> size.
> | >> | 
> | >> |    https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?35307
> | >> | 
> | >> | Its not pushed yet, as I'm not sure which branch it should be applied 
> to.
> | >> | 
> | >> | If you don't have a preference, I'll push it to default.
> | >> 
> | >> Did this feature work correctly in previous versions of Octave, or has
> | >> this bug always been present?
> | >> 
> | >> jwe
> | > 
> | > This bug existed for the entire 3.4.x series. It was introduced when we 
> began to use gs to convert eps to bitmap formats. The 3.2.x series would have 
> worked correctly.
> | > 
> | > Ben
> | 
> | I pushed to default.
> | 
> |     http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/df695e37d404
> 
> I'm sorry I didn't reply earlier.  I do want to be somewhat
> conservative about what is applied to the stable branch but this
> change doesn't look that risky and it fixes a regression so it might
> be best to apply it to the stable branch.  I can transplant it if you
> agree.
> 
> jwe

Ok. I haven't transplanted before, so I think it best that you do it.

Thanks

Ben



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]