[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ? |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:05:04 -0500 |
On Jan 28, 2012, at 10:55 AM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 17-Jan-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
> | On Jan 17, 2012, at 9:14 AM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> |
> | > On 17-Jan-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
> | >
> | > |
> | > | On Jan 15, 2012, at 10:12 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
> | > |
> | > | > On Jan 15, 2012, at 8:28 PM, "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> wrote:
> | > | >
> | > | >> On 15-Jan-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
> | > | >>
> | > | >> | I've fixed a bug where bit map output was being saved in the
> improper size.
> | > | >> |
> | > | >> | https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?35307
> | > | >> |
> | > | >> | Its not pushed yet, as I'm not sure which branch it should be
> applied to.
> | > | >> |
> | > | >> | If you don't have a preference, I'll push it to default.
> | > | >>
> | > | >> Did this feature work correctly in previous versions of Octave, or
> has
> | > | >> this bug always been present?
> | > | >>
> | > | >> jwe
> | > | >
> | > | > This bug existed for the entire 3.4.x series. It was introduced when
> we began to use gs to convert eps to bitmap formats. The 3.2.x series would
> have worked correctly.
> | > | >
> | > | > Ben
> | > |
> | > | I pushed to default.
> | > |
> | > | http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/df695e37d404
> | >
> | > I'm sorry I didn't reply earlier. I do want to be somewhat
> | > conservative about what is applied to the stable branch but this
> | > change doesn't look that risky and it fixes a regression so it might
> | > be best to apply it to the stable branch. I can transplant it if you
> | > agree.
> | >
> | > jwe
> |
> | Ok. I haven't transplanted before, so I think it best that you do it.
>
> Looking at this today, if I do
>
> print test.eps '-S1024,768'
>
> the bounding box in the eps file is set to 1024x768, but the size of
> the plot does not fill the bounding box. Instead, it is in the top
> left corner of the page and occupies about 1/4 of the page area.
>
> Is that the correct behavior?
>
> jwe
No that's not correct.
I see what you describe using fltk, but gnuplot is working correctly for me. I
assume you only see this for fltk ?
I thought I had checked that this was working correctly when I pushed the
changeset below.
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/df695e37d404
I'll revert back and verify.
Ben
- patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/15
- patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/15
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/15
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?,
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/29