Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?

[Ben Abbott]

On Jan 28, 2012, at 12:36 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:

> On 28-Jan-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
> 
> | > Looking at this today, if I do
> | > 
> | >  print test.eps '-S1024,768'
> | > 
> | > the bounding box in the eps file is set to 1024x768, but the size of
> | > the plot does not fill the bounding box.  Instead, it is in the top
> | > left corner of the page and occupies about 1/4 of the page area.
> | > 
> | > Is that the correct behavior?
> | > 
> | > jwe
> | 
> | 
> | No that's not correct. 
> | 
> | I see what you describe using fltk, but gnuplot is working correctly
> | for me. I assume you only see this for fltk ?
> 
> Yes, it seems to work correctly for me with gnuplot.
> 
> jwe

I reverted to ...

                http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/df695e37d404

... and the fltk result fills the bbox for me.

The height of the bbox is tall by 2 points 

        %%BoundingBox: 0 0 1024 770 

I'll start bisecting to see if I can isolate the changeset that caused the 
regression.

Ben