[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ? |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:19:58 -0500 |
On Jan 28, 2012, at 11:19 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 28-Jan-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
> | I'm able to fix the problem. I've been reverting your reversion below and
> thought it was a MacOS X only thing.
> |
> |
> http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/diff/1367f2db49a2/src/graphics.cc
> |
> | With the sources up to date and reverting this specific changeset, the fltk
> output works correctly for me.
> |
> | If you apply the simple change below, does the fltk toolkit work as
> expected ?
>
> Unfortunately, no. It fails for a pair of figures that are generated
> in some horribly complicated way by an example from the MTEX package
> (http://code.google.com/p/mtex).
The problem is with the result displayed ?
> If you are really interested, you can try to see the problem by doing
> the following:
>
> * Download mtex 3.2.2
>
> * Unpack it and cd to the mtex-3.2.2 directory
>
> * Edit the file mtex_settings.m and uncomment the line
>
> %set_mtex_option('GrainSelector','off')
>
> * Create symbolic link in c/bin for your architecture. This
> directory has some binaries (ick, I know) for systems that run
> Matlab. For my system, I needed to do
>
> ln -s glnxa64 -> gnu-linux-x86_64
>
> in the c/bin directory
>
> * In the top-level directory, run Octave and type
>
> startup_mtex
>
> (answer no to the question about installing mtex globally)
>
> warning off Octave:missing-glyph
> more off
> graphics_toolkit fltk
> grain_demo
>
> You should get two plots that look something like the first pair of
> screenshots attached below. With the current stable sources, this is
> what I see. With your small patch applied, I get the second set of
> badly sized and blank plots.
>
> But these plot is generated by so much code spread around in many places
> that I think it will be very hard to debug.
>
> jwe
I've not seen mtex before. Turns out I have an interest in such things. I'll
install on Matlab and then try on Octave.
Ben
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, (continued)
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/15
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/17
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, Ben Abbott, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?, John W. Eaton, 2012/01/28
- Re: patch to be applied to default or stable ?,
Ben Abbott <=