Re: Qhull 2012.1 questions

[Tatsuro MATSUOKA]

Hello


--- On Fri, 2012/2/10, Brad Barber wrote:

> 7) Keep libqhullstatic.a.   Marco prefers 'libqhull.a' and 
> CLEAN_DIRECT_OUTPUT.    Using libqhullstatic.a avoids conflicts between 
> libqhull.a and libqhull.so.   Renaming libqhull.so to libqhull-6.so would 
> remove this conflict.   Does anyone else prefer libqhull.a?
> 
> 8) Continue to build the qhull executables as static builds.   It makes them 
> standalone and simplifies moving them elsewhere.

In MinGW convention, for example, libfoo.a is a static library and libfoo.dll.a 
is a library for dynamic build.

Therefore from the MinGW point of view, libqhull.a is preferable.

Regards

Tatsuro

Regard