[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab? |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:32:54 -0400 |
2012/3/16 Daniel J Sebald <address@hidden>:
> On 03/16/2012 06:53 AM, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>>
>> On 16 March 2012 01:30, Daniel J Sebald<address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>>> I also suggest adding a test to the file. There currently are several,
>>> but
>>> none that test the behavior of white space. E.g.,
>>>
>>> %!assert (bin2dec ("1 0 1"), 5)
>>
>>
>> This seems like a clear unintentional regression. Can you prepare a
>> changeset?
>
> Not easily, as I'm having problems getting the latest version which relates
> to the "why is the wiki page" discussion.
I think we determined the same information is in the manual. Are you
unable to reach the manual? What problems are you facing with cloning
the hg repo?
- Jordi G. H.
- bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Miguel Bazdresch, 2012/03/15
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Rik, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, John W. Eaton, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Rik, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Rik, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/03/17
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/03/17