[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?
From: |
ahowe42 |
Subject: |
Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab? |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Mar 2012 03:01:41 -0700 (PDT) |
If a string holds data that is too be operated upon, every character should
be meaningful. Using [1 0 1] to indicate [101] is bad programming practice,
and an (admittedly small) inefficiency. I have also done MATLAB programming
using binary strings and bin2dec / dec2bin, and never included unnecessary
spaces (actually, logical arrays are much more useful and should be faster).
Is this really something that should be "fixed"?
Andrew
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/bin2dec-behavior-different-from-Matlab-tp4477272p4491775.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Miguel Bazdresch, 2012/03/15
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Rik, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, John W. Eaton, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Rik, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Rik, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/03/16
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/03/17
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/03/17
- Re: bin2dec behavior different from Matlab?, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/03/17