|
From: | Ben Abbott |
Subject: | Re: Implementation for missing function tetramesh |
Date: | Mon, 02 Apr 2012 07:48:14 -0400 |
On Apr 1, 2012, at 11:49 PM, Martin Helm wrote: > Am 02.04.2012 03:20, schrieb Ben Abbott: > >> I'm seeing a difference between Matlab and Octave. I've attached >> results for both demos. Ben > > Seems to be simply the different results of delaunay, can you run the > following tests in both cases > > load data.mat > clf () > colormap (jet > (64)) > h = tetramesh (tetra, > X); > for > ii=1:2:length(h); > > set(h(ii), "Visible", > "off"); > endfor > > > axis > equal > view (30, 20) > title ("Using jet (64), every other tetrahedron invisible") > > load data.mat > clf () > colormap (gray (256)); > tetramesh (tetra, X, 21:20:241, "EdgeColor", "w") > axis equal > view (30, 20) > title ("Using gray (256) and white edges") > > with the attached data.mat to rule that out? > > <data.mat> I had to convert data.mat to the Matlab format. After that, the results are the same. I've atttached a changeset. If there are no objections I'll push it later today. Ben
changeset.patch
Description: Binary data
matlab2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
matlab1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
fltk1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
fltk2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |