[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: .h.in vs .in.h
|
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
|
Subject: |
Re: .h.in vs .in.h |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:31:09 +0100 |
I think it's simply that you can't do:
grep ... *.h
This won't include *.h.in files.
Michael.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Júlio Hoffimann
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> What exactly is the problem with the grep regexps and the file extensions?
>
> Regards,
> Júlio.
>
> 2012/4/11 John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
>>
>> In Octave we have some .h and .cc files that are generated from .h.in
>> and .cc.in files. This naming scheme causes trouble if you are trying
>> to grep for all occurrences of some string in all .h files. To solve
>> this problem, gnulib uses .in.h instead. Is there any objection to
>> renaming the .h.in and .cc.in files to be .in.h and .in.cc instead?
>>
>> jwe
>
>
- .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h,
Michael Goffioul <=
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Júlio Hoffimann, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/11
- Re: .h.in vs .in.h, Daniel J Sebald, 2012/04/11