Re: java package

[John W. Eaton]

On  9-May-2012, Robert T. Short wrote:

| This makes more sense to me as well.  Even the --without-java thing 
| requires an extra step during configuration, probably causes some tests 
| to fail, and is ugly in general.

It is no different from --without-arpack, for example, and that is not
supposed to make any tests fail.  If you don't have a suitable Java
implementation installed, then you won't get the Java functions.  I
don't see this as a problem.

jwe