octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: java package

From: Michael D Godfrey
Subject: Re: java package
Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 18:02:59 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
On 05/09/2012 05:50 PM, John W. Eaton wrote: 
It is no different from --without-arpack, for example, and that is not
supposed to make any tests fail.  If you don't have a suitable Java
implementation installed, then you won't get the Java functions.  I
don't see this as a problem.

jwe
I agree.  And, leaving it as a "more accessible" package will
mean that many users never find it.  Sad, but true.
And, ugly as it is, Java has its uses.  For example, Android.

mdg
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]