Re: lgamma vs. xlgamma

[Rik]

On 07/08/2012 09:42 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 20:06:17 +0100
> From: Michael Goffioul <address@hidden>
> To: Octave Maintainers List <address@hidden>
> Subject: Unconditional use lgamma in betaincinv
> Message-ID:
>       <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi,
>
> I get a compilation failure in lo-specfun.cc, betaincinv makes
> unconditional use of lgamma. Shouldn't it use xlgamma instead?
Michael,

Quite right.  For systems which don't have lgamma in the C library we
should fall back on the Fortran version.  I checked in a fix here
(http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/bcf86cc2f1ee).

--Rik
>
> Michael.