Re: something changed ...

[Ben Abbott]

On Jul 26, 2012, at 3:09 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:

> On 26-Jul-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
> 
> | On Jul 26, 2012, at 2:05 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
> | 
> | > On 26-Jul-2012, Ben Abbott wrote:
> | > 
> | > | Ok, the actual libtool command looks more reasonable. I don't see any 
> of the unexpected pieces seen in the libtool link (none of the atlas libs or 
> references to gcc-4.5.3).
> | > 
> | > Then these libraries are added by libtool, possibly from the list of
> | > libraries that are listed as dependencies in .la files.
> | > 
> | > If you do
> | > 
> | >  find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 grep f77blas
> | > 
> | > in your build tree, what does it show?
> | > 
> | > jwe
> | 
> | I piped the output to a file and attached it.
> 
> It looks like the only places where f77blas appears is in things
> related to setting BLAS_LIBS or LIBS, and I think the LIBS settings
> are temporary, just for the configure tests.  But either way, it
> should end up in the Makefile variables for either BLAS_LIBS or LIBS.
> So I have no clue why this isn't working for you.
> 
> Are you having this problem with a clean checkout and build of the
> sources?
> 
> jwe

I've tried a clean archive twice.

Any point to poking about in the Makefile to see which variables contain 
libf77blas and the reference to gcc-4.5.3?

Is there a convenient way to print this stuff out so that the contents of the 
variables may be examined?

Ben