octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Octave-maintainers Digest, Vol 76, Issue 61


From: Doug Stewart
Subject: Re: Octave-maintainers Digest, Vol 76, Issue 61
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 17:02:03 -0400



On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Jonathan Lister <address@hidden> wrote:
They probably did as I have done and ported Octave Forge's Signal Processing Toolbox to MATLAB.

8 hrs to port a product that saves you $750 to $1000 means you are paying yourself at least $93 an hour.

That's not rocket science, its just business smarts.


But why not use it in octave  -- this is not rocket science ---> you would save 8 hours.  :-)


 


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "c." <address@hidden>
To: Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden>
Cc: "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:26:43 +0200
Subject: Re: pubblications

Il giorno 27/lug/2012, alle ore 17.42, Juan Pablo Carbajal ha scritto:

>
> I added short comment, feel free to improve it
> http://wiki.octave.org/Publications_using_Octave
>

Looks OK, I've cleaned the 2012 section.
In doing this I noticed that people refer to Octave in all sorts of strange ways.
The most puzzling was this one:

"The PSD we used was Welch's estimate (Welch 1967) available from Octave for MATLAB (Eaton 2002)."
which appears here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/9/3/036008

Any Idea what that may mean???? Does it mean they take the code from Octave and used it in Matlab?
Are they implying Octave is a Matlab toolbox??

Anyways I removed this publication as I don't understand what they intended.

c.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden>
To: "c." <address@hidden>
Cc: "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:28:07 +0200
Subject: Re: pubblications
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:26 PM, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Il giorno 27/lug/2012, alle ore 17.42, Juan Pablo Carbajal ha scritto:
>
>>
>> I added short comment, feel free to improve it
>> http://wiki.octave.org/Publications_using_Octave
>>
>
> Looks OK, I've cleaned the 2012 section.
> In doing this I noticed that people refer to Octave in all sorts of strange ways.
> The most puzzling was this one:
>
> "The PSD we used was Welch's estimate (Welch 1967) available from Octave for MATLAB (Eaton 2002)."
> which appears here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/9/3/036008
>
> Any Idea what that may mean???? Does it mean they take the code from Octave and used it in Matlab?
> Are they implying Octave is a Matlab toolbox??
>
> Anyways I removed this publication as I don't understand what they intended.
>
> c.

lol, "Octave for Matlab". They at least say Octave....


--
M. Sc. Juan Pablo Carbajal
-----
PhD Student
University of Zürich
http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "c." <address@hidden>
To: Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden>
Cc: "Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 18:50:36 +0200
Subject: Re: pubblications

Il giorno 27/lug/2012, alle ore 18.28, Juan Pablo Carbajal ha scritto:

>>  I've cleaned the 2012 section.

I started cleaning 2011 as well, I marked publications that were checked and confirmed
with a "!" and publications that I cannot access with a "?" I'll call it a day for now,
if anyone wants to pick it up were I left please use the same notation.

c.





--
DAS

https://linuxcounter.net/user/206392.html

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]