[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
trivial or significant test failure?
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
trivial or significant test failure? |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:19:01 -0400 |
Using atlas-3.10.0 on MacOS X, I'm seeing this failure that at first glance
looked trivial to me. But after running the test several times I'm reliably
getting the same answer. Should I open a bug report or just increase the
tolerance?
Ben
>>>>> processing
>>>>> /Users/bpabbott/Development/mercurial/default/src/DLD-FUNCTIONS/eigs.cc
***** testif HAVE_ARPACK
[v1,d1] = eigs (A, k, "si");
d1 = diag (d1);
for i=1:k
assert (max (abs ((A - d1(i)*eye (n))*v1(:,i))), 0, 1e-11);
endfor
!!!!! test failed
assert (max (abs ((A - d1 (i) * eye (n)) * v1 (:, i))),0,1e-11) expected
0
but got
3.0465e-11
maximum absolute error 3.04655e-11 exceeds tolerance 1e-11
- trivial or significant test failure?,
Ben Abbott <=