|
From: | Michael D Godfrey |
Subject: | Re: binary RPMs of Octave stable for enterprise Linux systems |
Date: | Sun, 29 Jul 2012 18:13:19 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 |
On 07/29/2012 04:53 PM, Thomas Yengst
wrote:
I have been building current versions for Fedora RHEL 5 systems becauseI have built Octave 3.6.2 RPMs for CentOS-5 and Scientific Linux 6 and am happy to build for other flavors of Linux if there is interest and a place to store them. there are people who depend on me to do it. The last system I built there is 3.6.2. I could summarize what was needed to get that working. But, also, I suspect that I will need to do it again for the next release. LLVM may, for example, be a problem. There is no llvm at all in the RHEL 5 repositories. I know that RHEL 5 is ancient history, but there are quite a few sites that are essentially locked into it. Some, but not necessarily all, of their software suppliers support newer RHEL systems, and RedHat says that the only "safe" way to move from 5 to newer versions is to do fresh installs. Upgrading is not an option. This is close to impossible at sites where there are many RHEL 5 systems. The idea of doing them all at once with some fallback in case it goes wrong is practically impossible since it also means switching versions of all the tools that are in use. It does not appear that the RedHat folks have thought this through. Therefore, there will be sites sitting at RHEL 5 at most for the foreseeable future. Tell me if I can help. mdg |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |