[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SuiteSparse problems
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: SuiteSparse problems |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Aug 2012 17:55:40 -0400 |
On Aug 5, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
>> On Aug 4, 2012, at 10:55 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 4, 2012, at 10:25 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 7:37 PM, Ed Meyer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Robinson, Melvin D <address@hidden>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Tried to build Octave from sources with the latest version of
>>>>> SuiteSparse. It seems that the symbol SuiteSparse_time has been
>>>>> deprecated. Here is the error message I receive
>>>>>
>>>>> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
>>>>> "_SuiteSparse_time", referenced from:
>>>>> _umfpack_tic in libumfpack.a(umfpack_gn_tictoc.o)
>>>>> _umfpack_toc in libumfpack.a(umfpack_gn_tictoc.o)
>>>>> ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
>>>>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>>>> make[3]: *** [liboctave.la] Error 1
>>>>> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
>>>>> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
>>>>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>>>> butterfly:octave melrobin$ port list SuiteSparse
>>>>> SuiteSparse @4.0.0 math/SuiteSparse
>>>>>
>>>>> Something similar happens on Fedora as well. Backing down to SuiteSparse
>>>>> 3.7.1 works.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> what version of umfpack do you have - my 5.4 calls umfpack_timer but not
>>>>> SuiteSparse_time so
>>>>> maybe you just need a newer umfpack
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> umfpack is part of the SuiteSparse meta-package. Correct ?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/sparse/SuiteSparse/
>>>>
>>>> SuiteSparse-4.0.2 has been released. I'll try a local build to see if the
>>>> problem is still present.
>>>>
>>>> Ben
>>>
>>> Building Octave with SuiteSparse-4.0.2 I still encounter the errors below
>>> (during the link phase for liboctave)
>>>
>>> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
>>> "_SuiteSparse_time", referenced from:
>>> _umfpack_tic in libumfpack.a(umfpack_gn_tictoc.o)
>>> _umfpack_toc in libumfpack.a(umfpack_gn_tictoc.o)
>>>
>>> A google (link below) indicates this problem can be fixed.
>>>
>>> http://trac.macports.org/ticket/35176
>>>
>>> When linking to libumfpack.a we must also link to libSuiteSparse.dylib. I
>>> manually edited the Makefile for liboctave and added -lSuiteSparse to the
>>> UMFPACK_LIBS variable.
>>>
>>> UMFPACK_LIBS = -lumfpack -lSuiteSparse
>>>
>>> liboctave now builds for me. I'll continue with my Octave build and report
>>> back later.
>>
>> My build completed, and have no new test failures (make check).
>>
>> I haven't verified, but setting UMFPACK_LIBS and then running configure or
>> passing UMFPACK_LIBS to configure should resolve this.
>>
>> export UMFPACK_LIBS="-lumfpack -lSuiteSparse"
>> ./configure ...
>>
>> or
>>
>> ./configure UMFPACK_LIBS="-lumfpack -lSuiteSparse" ...
>>
>> Ben
>
> Setting the UMFPACK_LIBS variable did not work. The configure script will
> need to be fixed. As a work around the liboctave Makefile may be manually
> modified.
>
> I've opened a bug report.
>
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?37031
>
> Ben
A simple work around it to add the configure script option below
--with-umfpack="-lumfpack -lSuiteSparse"
Ben
- Re: SuiteSparse problems, Ben Abbott, 2012/08/04
- Re: SuiteSparse problems, Ben Abbott, 2012/08/04
- Re: SuiteSparse problems, Ben Abbott, 2012/08/05
- Re: SuiteSparse problems, Ben Abbott, 2012/08/05
- Re: SuiteSparse problems,
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: SuiteSparse problems, Martin Helm, 2012/08/09
- Re: SuiteSparse problems, Ben Abbott, 2012/08/09
- Re: SuiteSparse problems, Martin Helm, 2012/08/09
- Re: SuiteSparse problems, Robinson, Melvin D, 2012/08/09
- Re: SuiteSparse problems, Martin Helm, 2012/08/09
- Re: SuiteSparse problems, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2012/08/10